Do public schools stunt teens’ maturity?

Newsweek carries a provocative essay, “why teenagers are growing up so slowly.” The topic includes but goes beyond public schooling.

Here’s where public schooling comes in:

Basically, we long ago decided that teens ought to be in school, not in the labor force. Education was their future. But the structure of schools is endlessly repetitive. “From a Martian’s perspective, high schools look virtually the same as sixth grade,” said Allen. “There’s no recognition, in the structure of school, that these are very different people with different capabilities.” Strapped to desks for 13+ years, school becomes both incredibly montonous, artificial, and cookie-cutter.

As Allen writes, “We place kids in schools together with hundreds, sometimes thousands, of other kids typically from similar economic and cultural backgrounds. We group them all within a year or so of one another in age. We equip them with similar gadgets, expose them to the same TV shows, lessons, and sports. We ask them all to take almost the exact same courses and do the exact same work and be graded relative to one another. We give them only a handful of ways in which they can meaningfully demonstrate their competencies. And then we’re surprised they have some difficulty establishing a sense of their own individuality.”

And we wonder why it’s taking so long for them to mature.

On the other hand, most of the home-schooled children I have known seem to be remarkably mature for their age. Perhaps that’s because many home-schooling parents (contrary to stereotypes about “unsocialized children”) engage them in the broader world.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
%d bloggers like this: